Scientific Online Resource System

Scripta Scientifica Medica

Medical Publishing in the 21st Century: Why We Need to go Back

George St. Stoyanov


Editorials are a means for authors to communicate, congratulate, critique and state their own opinion of emerging and worrying trends in their field. In the following, some aspects of both positive and negative sides of modern medical publishing will be discussed with regards to changes over the course of history, since its primary conception to present days. A wider focus will be made on the change different types of manuscripts have undergone from past to present such as Editorials, Technical reports, Case reports, Original articles and Reviews. Modern day worrying trends such as publishing time and the dubious process of editorial and peer review and rejection as well as article database services and the modern-day irrelevance of Impact factor, together with its harmful effects of medical publishing as a whole. All aspects of the letter are based on the authors personal experience and observations.

Full Text


Wakeling S, Willett P, Creaser C, Fry J, Pinfield S, Spezi V. Open-Access Mega-Journals: A Bibliometric Profile. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0165359.

Dong P, Loh M, Mondry A. The “impact factor” revisited. Biomed Digit Libr [Internet]. 2005;2:7.

Powell K. Does it take too long to publish research? Nature. 2016;530:148–51.

Werneck de Carvalho LE, Sarraf JS, Semblano AAP, Moreira MA, de Lemos MN, de Mello VJ, et al. Central nervous system tumours profile at a referral center in the Brazilian Amazon region, 1997–2014. PLoS One. 2017 ;12:e0174439

Stoyanov GS, Dzhenkov DL, Kitanova M, Ghenev P, Tonchev AB. Demographics and Incidence of Histologically Confirmed Intracranial Tumors: A Five-year, Two-center Prospective Study. Cureus 2017 9(7): e1476



Article Tools
Email this article (Login required)
About The Author

George St. Stoyanov
Medical University - Varna "Prof. Dr. Paraskev Stoyanov", Varna, Bulgaria

Font Size