Scientific Online Resource System

Adipobiology

Section Policies

Table of Contents

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Editor's Foreword

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Lecture

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Reviews

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Editorial comment

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Research Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Clinical research article

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Dance Round

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Abstracts

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Book

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Spotlight

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

News

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Announcement

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Instructions to Authors

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

All manuscripts submitted to Adipobiology are subject to meticulous quality control and peer-review evaluation before reaching a decision. The entire editorial workflow is performed using the online manuscript tracking system in the following steps:

  1. The submitted manuscript is checked in the editorial office whether it is suitable to go through the normal peer review process.
  2. If deemed suitable, the manuscript is sent to 3 editors for peer-review. The choice of editors depends on the subject of the manuscript, the areas of expertise of the editors, and their availability.
  3. Each editor will have 4 weeks to provide evaluation of the manuscript. The editor may recommend publication, request revision by specifying parts of the manuscript that need to be improved, or provide a written critique of why the manuscript should not be published.
  4. If the majority of the editorial evaluations recommend rejection, the manuscript will be rejected. If the majority of the editorial evaluations recommend publication, the manuscript will be published in a revised form provided that the authors successfully answer the critics received. Typically, the Editor-in-Chief is the final authority on all editorial decisions. For manuscripts submitted to announced special issues the final authority are appointed Guest Editors.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Publication Fees

There are no article processing charges or publication fees.